Department of Toxic Substances Control Department of Toxic Substances Control
 

DTSC Permit Review Report

In late 2012, the Department of Toxic Substances Control commissioned an independent review of the Department's permitting program. The decision was part of DTSC's commitment to fix its foundation. It also was based on concerns expressed by a variety of stakeholders about the program's performance.

To conduct this review, DTSC chose an outside contractor, CPS HR Consulting (CPS), in order to provide both expertise in the field of performance evaluation and an unbiased view of the permitting program. During a period of 10 months, CPS looked at the effectiveness of the Program's policies and procedures and identified gaps and opportunities for improvement.

The resulting 115-page report, "Permitting Process Review and Analysis," made 20 specific findings and recommendations. DTSC has reviewed the report in depth and provided a response to these findings and recommendations. Links to the report and the response are located below.

Links

Background

DTSC's permitting program is an integral part of California's effort to manage hazardous wastes so that they do not pose a risk to public health or the environment. The program provides technical review and makes decisions on applications from facilities that want to store, treat or dispose of hazardous waste in California.  There are 117 facilities in the state that are permitted for these activities. 

Although the broad parameters of the review were developed by DTSC, CPS conducted the review with minimal DTSC oversight. To further ensure the review's independence, DTSC invited two respected leaders in the field to serve as outside advisors: Tom McHenry, a Los Angeles-based attorney who specializes in hazardous waste issues, and Bill Magavern, of the Coalition for Clean Air and former executive director for the Sierra Club of California.

While not a review of specific permit decisions made by staff, CPS asked questions of and sought information from DTSC permitting staff and managers, along with a diverse set of stakeholders.  Key areas of focus included the timelines of permit decisions, resources, management practices, the process of making permit decisions, the criteria for denying or approving a permit application, and performance measures. 

DTSC did not edit this report, nor did it make any attempt to influence its findings or recommendations.  Thus, the views and recommendations do not necessarily reflect those of DTSC or its management.  The review may contain factual errors.  However, DTSC recognizes that the findings and recommendations were based on the best available information at the time of the review.